• Southern California
  • Silicon Valley
  • Rocky Mountains
  • Pacific Northwest
  • Texas

Socaltech.com

High Tech News and Information for Southern California

 

Log In | Sign up

 
  • Home
  • News
    • Headlines
    • Interviews
    • Insights and Opinions
  • Calendar
  • Jobs
  • Deals
  • About
    • Blog
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
Follow Us:
 

Benjamin Kuo's Blog

Thoughts on Southern California's high tech and venture capital industry

Why smart metering isn’t the solution

July 30, 2009

I was struck this week by a huge rash of energy-related, venture funding deals in the last few weeks, all focused on some aspect smart metering or energy monitoring: Power Assure, Advanced Telemetry, CPower, eMeter, Hara, Control4, Tendril, EcoDog, and Optimum Energy (just to name a few).

There’s been a theme going around the clean technology investment area recently, with a lot of interest in both commercial and residential software and devices focused on helping consumers to monitor and see what their energy use is at any point in time (under the theory that consumers will be able to adjust their consumption patterns to reduce energy use/expense/etc.). Not all of the companies mentioned above, of course, are focused on residential energy usage (quite a few are in the commercial/industrial space), but the key idea with most of them is active management of energy use. Google even has its own effort in the area, Google PowerMeter–with the idea of wiring up all that data into interactive graphs accessible from your Google home page.

As someone with a reasonable interest in energy efficiency, and a technical background in electrical engineering, the only problem with a lot of this is: it’s all overkill.

It’s all well and good that people want to manage energy use and make more efficient use of power (in fact, it’s great)–but it seems like there’s so much focus on high tech software monitoring and extra equipment, wiring it to the Internet, etc.–that the simple, obvious things are being missed.

Earlier this year, I personally went through an energy audit of my own suburban residence, specifically on our electricity usage, with a less-than-$20-device I bought from Amazon.com (the Kill-A-Watt Electricity monitor). Basically, this device is plugged in between any device and your wall outlet (in essence, like a one outlet power strip) and lets you read out how much energy–in killowatts–your various electrical devices. Using the device, a spreadsheet, and walking around from room to room in my house I was able to figure out over the course of a few hours exactly how much energy our household was consuming. We added that to the power consumed on our various light fixtures (the wattage of each fixture/bulb, multiplied by how long those lights are on during a day/week/etc.) and you basically have the power consumption of your house. We cross checked that against our power bill, and it was pretty much spot on.

For our house, it was blindingly clear where the vast bulk of our energy usage was coming from: our refrigerator and freezer (45% of our use), plus during the summer, our air conditioning unit (which, when it’s on, pretty much dominates a vast percentage of our electricity use). Yes, lights were a piece of the consumption (17%, for us), as were all the various and sundry other “stuff” we had plugged into our outlets (computers, aquarium, TV, etc.). But, the key is: all of these are pretty much static. i.e. your fridge is going to be plugged in all day, and you’re not likely to be able to turn it on and off at will; your computer is going to be on when you’re using it, and the rest of the stuff isn’t adding up to all that much. Having a hour-by-hour, day-by-day reading of your energy use on your computer isn’t going to enable you to change your energy habits that much. Having that information is useful, but you really only need to do it once and/or when you’re plugging something in. Adding instrumentation into everything to make it energy readable at any point in time is not going to help all that much, because it’s going to be about the same from day to day, and the “big stuff” like your fridge isn’t going to change much (unless you completely replace it).

A one time examination of what you are using, in terms of energy, with a $20 device is more than enough to make huge changes in your overall energy consumption, without having to replace your outlets/smart meter things/load up software/etc. In our case, it was fairly straightforward to do the “simple stuff”–i.e. get rid of that energy hogging halogen lamp, replace all the lightbulbs with compact flourescents (and a few LEDs), unplug those couple of unused appliances — to shave a very significant amount of energy usage. It didn’t take fancy software or energy monitoring devices wired into the Internet, to get significant gains. Yes, there’s stuff we could do to even go further (i.e., upgrade to a more efficient refrigerator and dishwasher, etc.)–but that’s not something you’re changing every day.

I’m not against smart metering, or energy effiency (heck, we just installed a photovoltaic power system on our roof)  but it seems like something built for continuous monitoring (with attendant equipment upgrade costs across our entire energy infrastructure) is overkill for what, for most, is really a once (or once in awhile) activity. It seems–to me–the overall goal of energy efficiency might just be better served investing in helping people to actually do a simple, inexpensive energy audit, and make those small (but significant) changes to shave their energy usage.

Filed under:
Clean Energy by Benjamin Kuo

Thoughts and commentary from Benjamin F. Kuo, publisher of socalTECH.com.

Categories

  • Accelerators (1)
  • Advertising (8)
  • Advice (26)
  • Angel Investing (22)
  • Announcements (55)
  • Automotive (4)
  • Awards (10)
  • Billionares (1)
  • Biotech (4)
  • Blogs (43)
  • Bubble (9)
  • Clean Energy (24)
  • Communications (3)
  • Conferences (41)
  • Dot Com (6)
  • Economy (26)
  • Education (1)
  • Electronics (1)
  • Employment (14)
  • Entertainment (4)
  • Entrepreneurship (40)
  • Events (18)
  • Finance (3)
  • Google (6)
  • Hardware (1)
  • Hollywood (16)
  • India (2)
  • Internet (7)
  • IPO (13)
  • Jobs (19)
  • Lawsuits (2)
  • Links (3)
  • Media (17)
  • Mergers and Acquisitions (24)
  • Networking (4)
  • News (2)
  • Patents (2)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Privacy (3)
  • Random (23)
  • Rumors (4)
  • Silicon Valley (26)
  • Social Networking (11)
  • Software (7)
  • Southern California (32)
  • Startups (106)
  • Technology (23)
  • Technology Transfer (4)
  • Twitter (10)
  • Uncategorized (148)
  • Venture Capital (120)
  • Video (3)
  • Video Games (4)
  • Virtual Reality (5)
  • Web2.0 (6)
  • Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • Blogroll

    • Aaron Fyke
    • Aaron Ross – PebbleStorm
    • Andrew Warner – Mixergy
    • Ask The Angels
    • Baron Miller
    • Boingboing
    • Digital Media Wire
    • Doing Business with UC in SoCAL
    • Douglas Welch – Career Opportunities
    • Eric David Greenspan – Make It Work
    • Everything Startup
    • Gary Augusta – OCTANe
    • I’m There For You Baby
    • Jared Reitzin
    • Jeff Cohn
    • Jim Butz – Angel Investor
    • John Greathouse – RevUpNet
    • Jonathan Handel – Digital Media Law
    • Joyce Schwartz – Hollywood 2020
    • Ken Hayes – Pasadena Angels
    • KenRadio
    • Kurt Daradics
    • Lalawag
    • Mark Averitt – Okapi VC
    • Mark Suster – GRP Partners
    • Matt Ridenour – Momentum Venture Partners
    • Matthew DeBord – KPCC
    • Michael Jones – Userplane
    • MOTM
    • Nicole Jordan
    • Orange County High Tech Report
    • Paidcontent.org
    • Peter Lee – Baroda Ventures
    • PowerUp Podcasts – Interviews with Technology Leaders
    • Ryan Born – AudioMicro
    • Ryan Huff – Dailyslop
    • Scott Fox
    • Scott Thompson
    • Sid Mohasseb – Venture Farm
    • socalTECH.com
    • StartupArmy
    • Technology Council Blog
    • The Frank Peter’s Show
    • Tony Karrer – SOCAL CTO
    • Willan Johnson – Clearstone EIR
    • William Quigley – Clearstone Ventures
  • Technology Organizations

    • Caltech/MIT Enterprise Forum
    • Central Coast MIT Forum
    • Gold Coast Business Forum
    • LA Community Development Commission
    • LABTC
    • Los Angeles Venture Association
    • Maverick Angels
    • MIT Enterprise Forum of San Diego
    • MOTM
    • NITRO LA
    • OC Venture Group
    • OCTANe
    • Pasadena Angels
    • San Diego Software Industry Council
    • San Diego Venture Group
    • Tech Coast Angeles
    • Tech Coast Venture Network
    • TechBizConnection
    • Technology Council of Southern California
    • USC Stevens Institute
  • Meta

  • Log in
  •  
     
     

    socaltech.com

    Home | News | Calendar | Jobs | Deals | About

    | Mobile

    ©2010 SOCALTECH LLC. All Rights Reserved.