<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another hazard of blogging: death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.socaltech.com/2008/04/07/another-hazard-of-blogging-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.socaltech.com/2008/04/07/another-hazard-of-blogging-death/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Southern California's high tech and venture capital industry</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AndrewWarner</title>
		<link>http://blog.socaltech.com/2008/04/07/another-hazard-of-blogging-death/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewWarner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.socaltech.com/?p=329#comment-904</guid>
		<description>The surprising thing for me about that article is how hard these bloggers work and how little they earn.

The NY Times compared it to sweatshops.

The bloggers profiled did more work that the startups they covered--and they're not getting nearly as rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The surprising thing for me about that article is how hard these bloggers work and how little they earn.</p>
<p>The NY Times compared it to sweatshops.</p>
<p>The bloggers profiled did more work that the startups they covered&#8211;and they&#8217;re not getting nearly as rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.407 seconds -->
