<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Insecurity questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.socaltech.com/2007/12/12/insecurity-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.socaltech.com/2007/12/12/insecurity-questions/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Southern California's high tech and venture capital industry</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.socaltech.com/2007/12/12/insecurity-questions/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.socaltech.com/2007/12/12/insecurity-questions/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Good point.  I have been concerned that the services which use these 2 factor authentication techniques will ultimately all share the same information, and so the security that the 2nd factor adds will diminish over time.  My preferred method are the RSA tokens.  They are much more costly than a pure software/information based method, so banks shy away from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I have been concerned that the services which use these 2 factor authentication techniques will ultimately all share the same information, and so the security that the 2nd factor adds will diminish over time.  My preferred method are the RSA tokens.  They are much more costly than a pure software/information based method, so banks shy away from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.744 seconds -->
